Overblog
Edit post Follow this blog Administration + Create my blog

Galatians 6

Posted on by John Chiarello

GALATIANS 6 [Conc.]

https://youtu.be/sBr1XDStkOo Galatians 6

https://ccoutreach87.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/1-31-17-galatians-6-conc.zip

Galatians 6:17 From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.

Galatians 6:18 Brethren, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen.

ON VIDEO-

.Abe from North Bergen

.Paul says ‘good bye’

.Steve Miller band

.Stevie Nicks [landslide] https://youtu.be/4xW2taEoH6s

.Legal and experiential justification

.Grace is not a license to sin

.Holocaust

.Not an anti-Jewish letter

.We are ALL one in Christ

.It’s an inclusive message

.Some North Bergen stories

.Comments on media

.Malachi Martin

.St. Augustine

.Pelagius

.The Catholic Church does not teach salvation by the law

.Have grace with one another

NEW- [past posts- verses below]

During this study I have been adding an old commentary I wrote years ago- the videos are new.

I’ll just add a note here at the end.

This letter is a ‘theological’ one- meaning- the purpose is to show how God- in Christ- has fulfilled the law.

And we become justified- not by the law- but by faith in Christ.

Pretty simple.

When Paul speaks 'harsh’ about the ‘circumcision’- meaning his Jewish brothers who were trying to institute circumcision as a rite for the gentile believers-

He is not in any way making anti-Semitic statements- or ‘bad’ statements against any ethnic/religious group.

He is fighting for the gospel of grace.

Over the history of the church- some Christians did indeed espouse anti- Jewish beliefs- based on these portions of scripture.

Yes- Paul was hard on the ‘circumcision’- the Jews under the law- but it had nothing to do with ethnicity.

It was theological-

In this last chapter he even says to restore those who are wrong- in the spirit [attitude] of meekness.

In the world we live in today- it’s important for Christians- in my mind- to stand for the truth- but to do it in a way that does not demean other people.

Whether that be Jewish- Muslim- or any other group.

Yes- as Christians we fight against false doctrine- and at times- these are tough fights.

Thus the strong language we see at times in the New Testament.

But even Paul himself spoke about God reconciling all people- whether they be Jew- gentile- male- female- in Christ.

He fought hard against the Judiazers- because in reality they were indeed preaching an ‘exclusive’ message.

Saying the only ones who God accepts- are those who get circumcised- and join ‘their group’.

But the message of grace leaves the door open for all who believe.

Jew- non Jew- male- female- all are accepted equally thru the message of the Cross.

So I just wanted to end this brief study with this point.

Yes- read these bible books for yourselves.

Go thru the bible- the Letters I have been covering.

Whatever background you come from- it makes no difference.

You are here now- reading this stuff- or maybe watching some of the videos.

The purpose is for you yourself to engage in the grand debate- that has been going on for 2 thousand years now [since the time of Christ that is].

Yes- the debate about life itself- what’s man’s purpose in it?

What does the bible actually teach about all these subjects?

The bible was written for the common man to read- and understand.

I’ll admit there is some stuff that is hard to understand at times.

But when you engage in the text- read the background of the times- see what the teachers over the years have said as well-

In the end- the main message of grace is clear- it is easy to understand.

The free gift of God by grace is for all of us.

And remember- it is a gift for all.

PAST LINKS [ Teaching I did before that relates to today’s post- ‘Galatians 6’-

https://ccoutreach87.com/romans-updated-2015/

https://ccoutreach87.com/hebrews-updated-2015/

https://ccoutreach87.com/justification-by-faith/

https://ccoutreach87.com/protestant-reformation-luther/

https://ccoutreach87.com/judges-ruth-video-links-included/

https://ccoutreach87.com/ephesians-highlights/

GALATIANS [Links]

https://ccoutreach87.com/2016/12/26/galatians-1/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2016/12/30/2nd-samuel-3-homeless-friends/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/02/galatians-2/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/10/galatians-3/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/12/the-seed/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/16/galatians-4/

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/24/galatians-5/

 

(1338) GALATIANS 6- Paul closes this short theological treatise with some practical stuff; help each other out with their burdens, if you see a brother struggling, restore him in the spirit of meekness. Those who are teaching you Gods word, ‘communicate’ to them in all good things [share with them financially and materially]. Good advice that Paul gives to all of the churches he writes to. As we close our study of this letter, I want to emphasize that the majority of what Paul is teaching [over 90%] is great theological truth, it would be silly for preachers/teachers to grasp hold of any single verse and to exalt that above the main body of truths that we have discussed. It isn't hard for any preacher/teacher to go thru this letter on a few Sundays and teach the main truths of the letter. We desperately need to get back to doing it this way in many Pentecostal/Protestant/Evangelical churches- and yes, the ‘organic church’ guys too! We all have a tendency to pick out pet doctrines out of the New Testament and then to make the side issues the main thing. I think the main thing [justification by faith, the blessing of Abraham in context, etc.] is good enough without us having to try and find some type of ‘Rhema word’ that is not the main word of God. Recently a good man died, Oral Roberts. A few weeks have passed and I think it is okay to mention a few things. The media reported how many preachers showed up to the funeral in Cadillac’s and expensive cars, there have been various articles written about the legacy he will leave behind. Some wrongly said he was the father of the ‘Word of Faith/prosperity movement’ [E.W. Kenyon was the real father, and Kenneth Hagin and others lay claim to the title]. The point I want to make is Brother Roberts was a good man who did good things, but his way of doing doctrine is not my cup of tea. He was famous for popularizing the ‘seed-faith’ teaching. It comes from Paul’s letters when he does tell believers that if they give in faith God will bless them, true enough. But when we read the New Testament there are many warnings against greed and materialism, and when we take a simple practical truth from Paul, even though it’s true, and when this truth becomes our main message, then we err. In this last chapter of Galatians Paul gives practical advice about giving financially to those who are teaching you, good. But this is one verse in a letter filled with other main teachings, the important stuff if you will. For believers in our day to have built ministries/churches and to have as the foundation of these ministries the few practical side verses, is wrong. We need to focus on the main thing, and keep the main thing the main thing! [Redemption thru Christ's Blood, eternal life to those who believe, etc.] I don’t want to speak bad about brother Roberts, he was a good man who went home to be with the Lord, it’s just the discussion that has happened after his passing shows us how easy it is for good men to get sidetracked with a verse or 2 and then to exalt it out of context. As I conclude this brief study on Galatians, I think I will go back over a few main verses in the next week or so and give you some ‘practical’ things that I have gleaned these last few weeks. In a sense I will show you how God can speak to us in a personal way thru these letters, yet at the same time not losing the original meaning of the letters. One of the distinctions of the early church fathers was this Christ centered approach to the scripture, they looked for Jesus on every page. I’ll end with an example form Saint Augustine; he shared a thought on the story of Jesus walking on the water to the land, and that the disciples needed a wooden boat to ‘cross over’ he then applied the wood of the boat to the wood of the Cross and said how the Cross allows us to cross over to God, just like the boat let them cross over to the land. Now this is a simple example of applying scripture in a sort of symbolic way that is not in context, but nevertheless it’s okay to do. So I will do a few things like this in the next few posts. But while doing this, we want to not forget the main meaning of the letter, a good ‘side example’ should never negate the main body of truth.

 

(1340) GALATIANS AFTER-THOUGHTS: As I said the other day I will try and go back over a few verses and share a few more things on Galatians. One of the things I wanted to mention was the fact that I purposefully chose to teach the letter in the classic Protestant way [mostly] I avoided getting into the ‘New Perspective’ ideas on Paul and ‘what he really meant’. So let’s talk a little on it; as of the date of this writing there is a theological debate going on [mostly in the ivory towers, but seeping somewhat into mainstream thought] that re-looks at Paul and what the context of his day was. For instance when the Reformers of the 16th century spoke about being Justified by Faith and not by works, many of them were speaking about the works of tradition and the things they felt were wrong in the Catholic faith. Were they wrong in applying Paul this way? No. In context was Paul talking about the works of ‘Catholic tradition’ when saying men are not justified by works? No. So it’s good to point stuff like this out. The problem I see with some of the New Perspective theologians is they can explain stuff and when you’re done listening [reading] it’s possible to miss the heart of the New Testament doctrine on Justification by faith, we don’t want to lose people in the weeds when trying to peel the layers of the onion. So I purposefully chose to teach this letter in the plain way that most Protestants would understand it, but I do think that N.T. Wright [Bishop of Durham, Church of England] has good things to add to the debate [as well as John Piper- the Reformed Baptist preacher who has taken the New Perspective group and rebuked them]. It’s good and profitable to engage in these types of theological discussions, but we need to once again ‘keep the main thing the main thing’. I also avoided getting into the debate on exactly what ‘works of the law’ meant. Some think Paul was only referring to the rite of circumcision. In some verses [both here and in Romans] this is true. But some [N.T. Wright] apply this in a way that says the act itself was simply an ‘identifying badge’ that brought you into the community of God, while this is true, they get a little off track by not fully seeing that in Paul’s writings these things go hand in hand. Paul mixes in the ‘work of circumcision’ with the idea of keeping the moral law/10 commandments. When saying ‘we are not under the law’ Paul includes all of it, not just the ceremonial law. How do we know this? Because whenever Paul makes this argument he always adds ‘does this mean we go out and sin’? And his answer is always no, but instead of saying ‘no, don’t sin because we are still constrained by the 10 commandments’ he says ‘no, how can we who died to sin still live in it’. To be frank about it, many of the Reformed guys have problems with this as well, they teach a kind of theology that says the N.T. believer is under the law, I disagree. So as you can see this debate can go on for a while, that’s why I chose to avoid it in this study. I want all of our readers to be grounded in the basic truths of the letter before launching into a deeper level. Okay enough for now, tune in the next week or so and I’ll try and do some practical stuff from Galatians.[ overblog- see the rest here- https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/02/07/galatians-6/ ]

Comment on this post