Overblog
Edit post Follow this blog Administration + Create my blog

Acts 26

Posted on by John Chiarello

ACTS 26 [Plus JFK and Descartes]

Acts 26:22 Having therefore obtained help of God, I continue unto this day, witnessing both to small and great, saying none other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should come:Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.

JFK and Descartes- https://youtu.be/AqxR7aeaPUI

http://ccoutreach87.com/10-28-17-jfk-and-descartes/ 

 

Acts 26- https://youtu.be/NCx9Cij7Tp4

https://vimeo.com/240318888

http://ccoutreach87.com/10-24-17-acts-26/

http://ccoutreach87.com/10-24-17-acts-26-2/ 

 

 

ON VIDEOS- [Past teaching- verses below]

JFK and Descartes-

.The paragraph from the new document release said he was shot- from the front

.A brief review of Descartes

.The Jesuits

.Protestant Reformation

.Edgar Hoover said  ít’s important that the public believes there was only one shooter’- huh?

.Epistemology

.Dewboy Lister update

https://ccoutreach87.com/overview-of-philosophy/

https://ccoutreach87.com/protestant-reformation-luther/

 

Acts 26-

.Paul makes his case- again

. ‘’I was just like them’’

.Then came the Damascus road

.He became a witness of the resurrection

.He was being persecuted- for the same hope they were all waiting for!

.They just didn’t see it yet

.Justified by faith

.Alice recall [local stuff]

 

 

NEW- I figured I would talk some on the recent release of the long awaited JFK files.

It actually serves as a good example of media narrative- and how things are framed.

I’ll copy the most important section below- some of the things that actually went along with the claims of the ‘conspiracy theorists ‘as the media have marked them.

 

In short- the documents show a man speaking about the surgeon generals report [autopsy] and it clearly states that the president was indeed shot from the front- as well as the back [This was disclosed by POTITO- and was in the government documents]

I have seen various documentaries over the years- some that claimed to have real photos of the president- and these photos showed Kennedy with the back of his head ‘blown off’ then later they showed photos where they might have doctored the image.

I never knew if these photos were real-

 

One of the so called conspiracies were witnesses who said there was more than one shooter.

Others who have said Oswald could not have carried it out alone.

And the autopsy [according to the document]- at the start- said the same thing.

 

I also was not aware [like others who have researched this for years] that congress did another investigation later on- when new evidence of a police officers recording of that day came to light- the cop had his mic keyed- and unknowingly recorded the sounds of gun shots on the day Kennedy was killed.

 

Congress actually said at that time- there probably was more than one shooter.

That was their official conclusion- just from the audio.

 

 Later they tried to debunk the audio.

To me- the most explosive evidence was the fact that the document said Mr. Kennedy was shot from the front- and a bullet entered from the front- which is proof of more than one shooter.

 

You would think this would have been what the media focused on- but they did not.

Ok- I also did a brief review of Rene Descartes- hopefully will teach him on the next philosophy post-

I always intended to finish that study- but never had the chance.

I added the text of the paragraph below- as well as the links [at the end of this post]

 

I realize that it’s possible that the man who said this- could of course be wrong- but when added together with the other questions- it is somewhat of a ‘smoking gun’-

The main point I tried to make on the video- was how the media can shape narrative- if they want.

If you simply say ‘nothing here’- even if the documents show something- most people will never read them all-

 

And they are left with the narrative ‘nothing here’ even if there is ‘something there’-

That's my main point. [overblog- see here- https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/10/29/acts-26-2/ ]

 

 

PAST POSTS- [Past teaching I did that relates to this post- ACTS 26]

https://ccoutreach87.com/romans-updated-2015/

https://ccoutreach87.com/galatians-links/ 

ACTS-

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/18/acts-1/ 

https://ccoutreach87.com/2017/01/26/acts-2/ 

Comment on this post